Back to: Our Professionals

Vic Souto
Partner

609-454-3500 x310 phone

vsouto [AT]
meagheremanuel.com

NOTABLE SUCCESSES

  • Obtained a favorable settlement for a client who was named as a defendant in a trade secret misappropriation suit involving sophisticated 3-D modeling software to allow the client to avoid the distraction and expense of litigation against two much larger companies
  • Obtained summary judgment dismissing a trade secret misappropriation claim where the plaintiff was seeking in excess of $100 million in damages
  • Defeated a motion for a temporary restraining order that sought to prevent a client from completing a transfer of technology to the purchaser of the client’s manufacturing plant
  • Secured summary judgment of non-infringement and invalidity for a defendant in a two-patent infringement case involving Internet access technology


Member of trial teams that:
  • Successfully defended a client in a patent infringement case involving photolithography equipment in the International Trade Commission
  • Successfully defended a client in a patent infringement case involving mobile phone technology in the International Trade Commission
  • Secured a defense verdict in a bench trial that six patents were unenforceable as a result of inequitable conduct by the patentee
  • Secured plaintiff’s verdict for client in jury trial involving network technology
  • Secured defense verdicts in two jury trials that cellular technology patents were not infringed


REPRESENTATIVE CASES
  • Nokia v. Apple, International Trade Commission and D.Del. (patent infringement case involving standard essential cellular telephone technology) – cases settled on favorable terms
  • Apple v. Samsung, N.D.CA (patent infringement case involving cellular telephone technology) – obtained jury verdict in favor of client
  • Ericsson v. Apple, International Trade Commission and E.D.TX (patent infringement case involving standard essential cellular telephone technology) – cases settled on favorable terms
  • Core Wireless v. Apple, E.D.TX (patent infringement case involving standard essential cellular telephone technology) – obtained jury verdict in favor of client
  • Broadcom v. Emulex, C.D.CA (patent infringement case involving networking technology) – obtained post-trial verdict of infringement for client
  • Agfa v. Creo, D.MA (patent infringement case involving offset printing technology) – obtained verdict in a bench trial that six patents were unenforceable because of inequitable conduct
  • PowerOasis v. Cisco Systems, D.N.H. (patent infringement case involving Internet access technology) – obtained summary judgment of invalidity, which was affirmed by the Federal Circuit
  • PowerOasis v. Wayport, D.MA (patent infringement case involving Internet access technology) – obtained summary judgment of non-infringement, which was affirmed by the Federal Circuit
  • Cardiac Sciences, Inc. v. Defibtech LLC, D. Minn. (patent infringement case involving the hardware and software functionality of automated external defibrillators) – case settled on favorable terms
  • Golden Enterprises v. AT&T, M.D. FL (trade secret misappropriation case involving speech generation software products for telephone operator services) – obtained summary judgment in favor of AT&T
  • Telect, Inc. v. AT&T, E.D.WA (patent infringement case involving telephone central office connector equipment) – case settled on favorable terms
  • Gregory et al. v. AT&T, C.D.CA (patent infringement case involving software communications protocol for cordless telephones) – case settled on favorable terms
  • AT&T v. Microsoft, D.N.J. (software license dispute) – case settled on favorable terms
  • Siemens Hearing Instruments et al. v. Raindrop Geomagic, N.J. Sup. Ct. (trade secret misappropriation case involving 3D modeling software) – case settled on favorable terms
  • Zenith Electronics v. Philips Electronics N.A., et al., E.D. Tex. (patent infringement case involving standard essential high-definition television technology) – case settled on favorable terms


Bar Admissions
  • New Jersey
  • New York
  • Massachusetts
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
  • U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
  • U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey
  • U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York
  • U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York
  • U.S. District Court for the Western District of New York
  • U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts
  • U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California


Education
  • J.D., Fordham University School of Law
  • B.S., Electrical Engineering, Rutgers University


back to top
 

Meagher Emanuel Laks Goldberg & Bovino, LLP | One Palmer Square Suite 325 | Princeton, NJ 08542 | 609-454-3500